Skip to main content

25 years old!

I can't believe that Ch4 is twenty-five year's old! Surely it only started a few years ago! Perhaps it's old age creeping up on me. I got up this morning convinced that it was Monday. I planned my to-do-list for the day, made a cuppa, and turned on the wireless. "Funny", I thought, "that programme's usually on Sundays, must be a new season of repeats". It wasn't til I consulted the on-line TV schedule that I realised that it was Sunday. DOH!

managed to make a start on my church website...still need a name for it!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I HATE OXFAM

Walking through town today , I have been accosted by several of OXFAM's offensive young CHUGGERS OXFAM: A society formed by left-wing middle-class twats to assuage their feelings of guilt as they swig their Mouton-Cadet

piano miniature no 3

From the Reference Guide to Epidemiology of the Federal Judicial Center’s Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, the principal reference for instructing US courts in regard to epidemiology. The Manual states: “…epidemiology cannot objectively prove causation; rather, causation is a judgment for epidemiologists and others interpreting the epidemiological data.” [6], and “.. the existence of some [associated] factors does not ensure that a causal relationship exists. Drawing causal inferences after finding an association and considering these factors requires judgment and searching analysis.” [7] and “ [w]hile the drawing of causal inferences is informed by scientific expertise, it is not a determination that is made by using scientific methodology .”. Thus, while epidemiologists insist that their discipline is a science, clearly it is not the solid experimental science that produces reliable causal connections to fuel new scientific discoveries, successful technological advances, and