Skip to main content

ER WHAT ?

A friend of mine had to see a neurologist.....I report the gist of the consultation

Consultant: you mustn't be around smokers

Patient: I don't allow smoking in my house


Consultant: Just being around smokers would be dangerous for you


Patient: Well, as I said no one smokes in my house, or work, or car

Consultant: SMOKERS ARE BAD FOR YOU WHETHER THEY'RE SMOKING or NOT !!!


I kid you not...this is the sort of mediaeval superstition we are all up against .

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I HATE OXFAM

Walking through town today , I have been accosted by several of OXFAM's offensive young CHUGGERS OXFAM: A society formed by left-wing middle-class twats to assuage their feelings of guilt as they swig their Mouton-Cadet
Post a Comment
Read more

piano miniature no 3

Post a Comment
Read more
From the Reference Guide to Epidemiology of the Federal Judicial Center’s Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, the principal reference for instructing US courts in regard to epidemiology. The Manual states: “…epidemiology cannot objectively prove causation; rather, causation is a judgment for epidemiologists and others interpreting the epidemiological data.” [6], and “.. the existence of some [associated] factors does not ensure that a causal relationship exists. Drawing causal inferences after finding an association and considering these factors requires judgment and searching analysis.” [7] and “ [w]hile the drawing of causal inferences is informed by scientific expertise, it is not a determination that is made by using scientific methodology .”. Thus, while epidemiologists insist that their discipline is a science, clearly it is not the solid experimental science that produces reliable causal connections to fuel new scientific discoveries, successful technological advances, and
2 comments
Read more